| Title |
What do we know about evidence-informed priority setting processes to set population-level health-research agendas: an overview of reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the National Research Centre, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42269-021-00687-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Audrey Tan, Sumanth Kumbagere Nagraj, Mona Nasser, Tarang Sharma, Tanja Kuchenmüller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,287,771
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the National Research Centre
#16
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,588
of 515,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the National Research Centre
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.