↓ Skip to main content

Joint response–effect compatibility

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Joint response–effect compatibility
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0528-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roland Pfister, Thomas Dolk, Wolfgang Prinz, Wilfried Kunde

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Hong Kong 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 55%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,728,715
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#4
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,719
of 224,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.