| Title |
The promise of computer adaptive testing in collection of orthopaedic outcomes: an evaluation of PROMIS utilization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-021-00407-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam H. Wong, James E. Meeker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#12,812,878
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#163
of 496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,004
of 499,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 496 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.