↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00464-015-4148-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. R. Spanjersberg, J. D. P. van Sambeeck, A. Bremers, C. Rosman, C. J. H. M. van Laarhoven

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Turkey 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Researcher 12 14%
Other 10 12%
Unspecified 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 60%
Unspecified 18 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2016.
All research outputs
#10,348,492
of 13,560,065 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,882
of 3,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,108
of 263,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#88
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,560,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,953 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.