Title |
Diagnosing capillary leak in critically ill patients: development of an innovative scoring instrument for non-invasive detection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00965-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jakob Wollborn, Lars O. Hassenzahl, Daniel Reker, Hans Felix Staehle, Anne Marie Omlor, Wolfgang Baar, Kai B. Kaufmann, Felix Ulbrich, Christian Wunder, Stefan Utzolino, Hartmut Buerkle, Johannes Kalbhenn, Sebastian Heinrich, Ulrich Goebel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 25% |
Belgium | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 19 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 23 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,992,631
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#396
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,835
of 513,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.