↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a simultaneous adsorption device for cytokines and platelet–neutrophil complexes in vitro and in a rabbit acute lung injury model

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of a simultaneous adsorption device for cytokines and platelet–neutrophil complexes in vitro and in a rabbit acute lung injury model
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40635-021-00414-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yumiko Sekiya, Kaoru Shimada, Hiroshi Takahashi, Chisa Kuga, Shunsuke Komachi, Keishi Miwa, Toru Kotani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Chemistry 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2021.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#318
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,338
of 429,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.