↓ Skip to main content

Methods to isolate extracellular vesicles for diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Micro and Nano Systems Letters, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Methods to isolate extracellular vesicles for diagnosis
Published in
Micro and Nano Systems Letters, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40486-017-0049-7
Authors

Hyejin Kang, Jiyoon Kim, Jaesung Park

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 23%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Engineering 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 47 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Micro and Nano Systems Letters
#6
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,497
of 311,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Micro and Nano Systems Letters
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.