| Title |
The “needle re-entry” technique for infrainguinal arterial calcified occlusive lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CVIR Endovascular, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42155-021-00274-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takuya Haraguchi, Yoshifumi Kashima, Masanaga Tsujimoto, Tomohiko Watanabe, Hidemasa Shitan, Takuro Sugie, Daisuke Hachinohe, Umihiko Kaneko, Ken Kobayashi, Daitaro Kanno, Katsuhiko Sato, Tsutomu Fujita |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,863,586
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#40
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,418
of 510,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.