| Title |
A review of research on salivary biomarkers for oral cancer detection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Medicine, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2001-1326-3-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi-Shing Lisa Cheng, Terry Rees, John Wright |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 15% |
| Researcher | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 13% |
| Engineering | 13 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#337
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,007
of 237,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.