↓ Skip to main content

The use of cognitive ability measures as explanatory variables in regression analysis

Overview of attention for article published in IZA Journal of Labor Economics                , October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
The use of cognitive ability measures as explanatory variables in regression analysis
Published in
IZA Journal of Labor Economics                , October 2012
DOI 10.1186/2193-8997-1-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Junker, Lynne Steuerle Schofield, Lowell J Taylor

Abstract

Cognitive ability measures are often taken as explanatory variables in regression analysis, e.g., as a factor affecting a market outcome such as an individual's wage, or a decision such as an individual's education acquisition. Cognitive ability is a latent construct; its true value is unobserved. Nonetheless, researchers often assume that a test score, constructed via standard psychometric practice from individuals' responses to test items, can be safely used in regression analysis. We examine problems that can arise, and suggest that an alternative approach, a "mixed effects structural equations" (MESE) model, may be more appropriate in many circumstances.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 28%
Researcher 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 40%
Social Sciences 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from IZA Journal of Labor Economics               
#44
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,981
of 192,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IZA Journal of Labor Economics               
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.