↓ Skip to main content

Interface crack between different orthotropic media under uniform heat flow

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
Title
Interface crack between different orthotropic media under uniform heat flow
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3105-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheng-Hu Ding, Xing Li

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,192,422
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#256
of 1,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,367
of 334,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#36
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.