↓ Skip to main content

Subtyping glioblastoma by combining miRNA and mRNA expression data using compressed sensing-based approach

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Subtyping glioblastoma by combining miRNA and mRNA expression data using compressed sensing-based approach
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1687-4153-2013-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenlong Tang, Junbo Duan, Ji-Gang Zhang, Yu-Ping Wang

Abstract

In the clinical practice, many diseases such as glioblastoma, leukemia, diabetes, and prostates have multiple subtypes. Classifying subtypes accurately using genomic data will provide individualized treatments to target-specific disease subtypes. However, it is often difficult to obtain satisfactory classification accuracy using only one type of data, because the subtypes of a disease can exhibit similar patterns in one data type. Fortunately, multiple types of genomic data are often available due to the rapid development of genomic techniques. This raises the question on whether the classification performance can significantly be improved by combining multiple types of genomic data. In this article, we classified four subtypes of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with multiple types of genome-wide data (e.g., mRNA and miRNA expression) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project. We proposed a multi-class compressed sensing-based detector (MCSD) for this study. The MCSD was trained with data from TCGA and then applied to subtype GBM patients using an independent testing data. We performed the classification on the same patient subjects with three data types, i.e., miRNA expression data, mRNA (or gene expression) data, and their combinations. The classification accuracy is 69.1% with the miRNA expression data, 52.7% with mRNA expression data, and 90.9% with the combination of both mRNA and miRNA expression data. In addition, some biomarkers identified by the integrated approaches have been confirmed with results from the published literatures. These results indicate that the combined analysis can significantly improve the accuracy of classifying GBM subtypes and identify potential biomarkers for disease diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#25
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,871
of 292,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them