↓ Skip to main content

Age of red blood cells and transfusion in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Age of red blood cells and transfusion in critically ill patients
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2110-5820-3-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cécile Aubron, Alistair Nichol, D Jamie Cooper, Rinaldo Bellomo

Abstract

Red blood cells (RBC) storage facilitates the supply of RBC to meet the clinical demand for transfusion and to avoid wastage. However, RBC storage is associated with adverse changes in erythrocytes and their preservation medium. These changes are responsible for functional alterations and for the accumulation of potentially injurious bioreactive substances. They also may have clinically harmful effects especially in critically ill patients. The clinical consequences of storage lesions, however, remain a matter of persistent controversy. Multiple retrospective, observational, and single-center studies have reported heterogeneous and conflicting findings about the effect of blood storage duration on morbidity and/or mortality in trauma, cardiac surgery, and intensive care unit patients. Describing the details of this controversy, this review not only summarizes the current literature but also highlights the equipoise that currently exists with regard to the use of short versus current standard (extended) storage duration red cells in critically ill patients and supports the need for large, randomized, controlled trials evaluating the clinical impact of transfusing fresh (short duration of storage) versus older (extended duration of storage) red cells in critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Other 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,766,397
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#213
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,979
of 307,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.