↓ Skip to main content

Appendix-preserving elective herniorrhaphy for de Garengeot hernia: two case reports

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Appendix-preserving elective herniorrhaphy for de Garengeot hernia: two case reports
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40792-021-01329-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiromitsu Imataki, Hideo Miyake, Hidemasa Nagai, Yuichiro Yoshioka, Koji Shibata, Yuichi Kambara, Norihiro Yuasa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,277,558
of 21,243,519 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#77
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,880
of 459,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#22
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,243,519 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.