| Title |
Insights from patients screened but not randomised in the HYPERION trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00947-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. B. Lascarrou, Gregoire Muller, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Nicolas Massart, Mickael Landais, Pierre Asfar, Jean-Pierre Frat, Jean-Charles Chakarian, Michel Sirodot, Bruno Francois, Guillaume Grillet, Sylvie Vimeux, Arnaud Delahaye, Stéphane Legriel, Didier Thevenin, Jean Reignier, Gwenhael Colin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 24% |
| France | 6 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
| Scientists | 8 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,791,930
of 25,081,419 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#217
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,222
of 426,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.