↓ Skip to main content

Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
230 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-012-2731-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annibale D’Annibale, Graziano Pernazza, Igor Monsellato, Vito Pende, Giorgio Lucandri, Paolo Mazzocchi, Giovanni Alfano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 52%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 44 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,150,673
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#642
of 6,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,323
of 281,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#8
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,001 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.