| Title |
Development of boards made from oil palm frond II: properties of binderless boards from steam-exploded fibers of oil palm frond
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, August 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00766224 |
| Authors |
Nikhom Laemsak, Motoaki Okuma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 25 | 27% |
| Materials Science | 12 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#61
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,401
of 38,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them