Experimenting quantum phenomena on NISQ computers using high level quantum programming

@BrianRLaCour1 @skdh https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@quaintum @quantumjournal Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@letonyo Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxD3sc

@catani_lorenzo @mattleifer @GioSca16 @davidschmid @RobertSpekkens Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@carlorovelli Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@SoulPhysics @ericcavalcanti Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@zlatko_minev @MIT @techreview Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxD3sc

@QuantumC2T @ANUmedia @pingkoylam @Nature Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@QuantumAephraim @UofT @A_Aspuru_Guzik @ChristineAllenW Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxD3sc

@jswillims21 Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@QuantumAephraim @Nature @CQIQC_Toronto @uoftphysics Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@QuantumAephraim @IOPPublishing Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@worldviewdesign @majestyofreason Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@coecke @ericcavalcanti Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

@wjzeng Does this study provide evidence that the choice of a measurement changes what happened in another measurement earlier? That is, the quantum eraser actually erases? https://t.co/AjTPCxCvCE

Doing the quantum eraser, Elitzur-Vaidman bomb and Hardy's paradox on IBMQ's systems #quantum https://t.co/EtjlZM6IiH

#キャルちゃんのquantphチェック IBMのNISQ上で高レベルプログラミング言語を用いて、量子イレイサー・Elitzur-Vaidmanボム・Hardyのパラドックス実験を実行。高いエンタングルメントゲート精度が求められるこれらにおいて、最大3量子ビットで理論予想と一致。 https://t.co/lBntqLQN99 https://t.co/wsvcMOLYSK

[2111.02896] Reproducing quantum experiments on NISQ computers using high level quantum programming https://t.co/4GjMUCkJYc

[2111.02896] Duc M. Tran, Duy V. Nguyen, Le Bin Ho et al.: Reproducing quantum experiments on NISQ computers using high level quantum programming https://t.co/qyDaPvJOav https://t.co/I8CiYXfici