RT @LivHPartners: Congratulations 👏
RT @LivHPartners: Congratulations 👏
Congratulations 👏
RT @LHCHFT: LHCH Radiology researchers have been awarded this year's Best Paper Prize by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (…
RT @LHCHFT: LHCH Radiology researchers have been awarded this year's Best Paper Prize by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (…
LHCH Radiology researchers have been awarded this year's Best Paper Prize by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR). 👏 Read the full article➡️https://t.co/xDWwWj9gnw Many congratulations to all involved. #TeamLHCH https://t.co/B7aj2vLy
@TregubovaMariia @Spotify @EscrOffice @ESTI_Society …and I barely took more pictures! Everything was just too interesting and engaging (so good) Excellent programme, good organisation and welcoming atmosphere And we got this award of course! https://t.c
🥳 Well done! #InsightsIntoImaging 👇
..an update: this article has just received Best Paper Award from the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology 🤩 Many thanks to the team 💫 https://t.co/zYQ6yYSnrV
🥳Very glad I could represent Dr Simkus, the 1st author of our paper to receive the ESCR Best Paper Award @InsightsImaging🤩 Thank you @myESR @EIBIR_biomed for the Seed Grant which enabled us to pursue the idea & deliver the results🙏 This is the articl
RT @InsightsImaging: Comparing cardiothoracic ratio with volumetric and functional parameters derived from #cardiac MRI. (Paulius Simkus et…
RT @InsightsImaging: Comparing cardiothoracic ratio with volumetric and functional parameters derived from #cardiac MRI. (Paulius Simkus et…
Comparing cardiothoracic ratio with volumetric and functional parameters derived from #cardiac MRI. (Paulius Simkus et al.) #InsightsIntoImaging #RadiologyHeadToToe Want to read more? Click the link below ⬇️ https://t.co/LOpXGfB9WN https://t.co/Hpftql3f
#PredatoryJournal highlight. Does not reach the awesomeness of the previous Herpetology invite, but close enough! #spaceradiology 🛰️🚀🌌🧑🚀 Dear Editor - #Cardiothoracicratio is not rocket science. Also, it is a limited tool to assess cardiac size. https:/
RT @Arzanauskaite: Honoured to see our article on CTR & #whyCMR trending in @ESR_Journals #InsightsImaging 👏 Want to learn more about the…
RT @LorenzGiovanni: Ever wondered about that 🫀on cxr? Excellent work done to help define Cardiothoracic ratio. #radtwitter #cardiotwiterr #…
Ever wondered about that 🫀on cxr? Excellent work done to help define Cardiothoracic ratio. #radtwitter #cardiotwiterr #WhyCMR
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: 👏👏👏as one of the @myesr @EIBIR_biomed Seed Grant awardees I cannot recommend this opportunity enough #radtwitter It is…
👏👏👏as one of the @myesr @EIBIR_biomed Seed Grant awardees I cannot recommend this opportunity enough #radtwitter It is not only a grant, but also support&mentorship E.g. check out the published article from our project #openaccess #whycmr #radiology
RT @CW4xCPSeSl21I72: CXR での心拡大と心臓MRIを比較 MRIの左室,右室,右房,右室の容量や面積,EFなどと比較 CTRは,MRIの心拡大やEFと弱い相関 MRIでの心拡大を正確に診断できるCTRのcut-off値なし CTR <50% にはMRIの心…
RT @Arzanauskaite: Morning! New Year has started with good news in my email — our article is now #3 of the Top 5 Research Outputs #Insights…
Morning! New Year has started with good news in my email — our article is now #3 of the Top 5 Research Outputs #InsightsImaging @ESR_Journals! Glad to see our work is reaching the readers well. The results are applicable to the daily #radiology practice
RT @EIBIR_biomed: Check out the results of one of our EIBIR-supported @myesr Research Seed Grant projects led by Monika @Arzanauskaite 👇
RT @Arzanauskaite: Lovely! Our paper has moved to the 4th position for the Top 5 of the journal’s outputs. If readers, community read, und…
RT @Arzanauskaite: Lovely! Our paper has moved to the 4th position for the Top 5 of the journal’s outputs. If readers, community read, und…
Lovely! Our paper has moved to the 4th position for the Top 5 of the journal’s outputs. If readers, community read, understand and share the article because they think it’s important and good, there is no better reward to authors 💛 Full access: https://
RT @Arzanauskaite: Honoured to see our article on CTR & #whyCMR trending in @ESR_Journals #InsightsImaging 👏 Want to learn more about the…
An update: the article is now among the Top 5 Research Outputs in the @myESR Insights into Imaging journal #radtwitter #cardiotwitter Open access here https://t.co/B3iTyOyaSI https://t.co/TEMNiWF6zs
RT @Arzanauskaite: Honoured to see our article on CTR & #whyCMR trending in @ESR_Journals #InsightsImaging 👏 Want to learn more about the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: Honoured to see our article on CTR & #whyCMR trending in @ESR_Journals #InsightsImaging 👏 Want to learn more about the…
Honoured to see our article on CTR & #whyCMR trending in @ESR_Journals #InsightsImaging 👏 Want to learn more about the usefulness of cardiothoracic ratio to define cardiomegaly? 🫀 Full paper, #openaccess here: https://t.co/B3iTyOyaSI https://t.co/c
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: ..are we seeing the end of an era? CTR>0.5 does not reliably predict #cardiomegaly ...& more findings: Full paper ava…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Perbess: Limitaciones del índice cardiotorácico (ICT) en RX de tórax para predecir el tamaño real del corazón Estudio RM como gold stan…
RT @Perbess: Limitaciones del índice cardiotorácico (ICT) en RX de tórax para predecir el tamaño real del corazón Estudio RM como gold stan…
Limitaciones del índice cardiotorácico (ICT) en RX de tórax para predecir el tamaño real del corazón Estudio RM como gold standard Evitar decisiones clínicas basadas en ICT (45-55%) ICT > 5️⃣5️⃣% probablemente sea indicativo de cardiomegalia @Arzanauska
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @biblio_laporte: Limitations of cardiothoracic ratio derived from chest radiographs to predict real heart size: comparison with magn… ht…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
This is one fantastic thread! Congrats to @Arzanauskaite and team! See 👇🏻 #radres #radiology #MedTwitter
..are we seeing the end of an era? CTR>0.5 does not reliably predict #cardiomegaly ...& more findings: Full paper available #OpenAccess at #InsightsImaging @SpringerNature @ESR_Journals https://t.co/b7P6uuALc4 #Radiology #IDoR #cardiotwitter #c
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: ...and on an amusing note: @PMccoubrie Rule #11 / / Never measure anything #RulesOfRadiology 😀 https://t.co/d0SNOf54b…
RT @Arzanauskaite: ...and on an amusing note: @PMccoubrie Rule #11 / / Never measure anything #RulesOfRadiology 😀 https://t.co/d0SNOf54b…
...and on an amusing note: @PMccoubrie Rule #11 / / Never measure anything #RulesOfRadiology 😀 https://t.co/d0SNOf54b4 (there's now a book, too) ➡️CTR, #whyCMR and #cardiomegaly article: https://t.co/b7P6uuALc4 https://t.co/fVXhb7hBjt
Wow great thread! Great work @Arzanauskaite CTR fits nicely within the ‘a radiologist with a ruler is a radiologist in trouble’ spectrum.
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
@TLHM_MD @hochhegger @farouk_dako @DanielaMartinMD @edonnellymdphd @meldincarvalho @ShravSridhar @RydhwanaH_MD @MandyChe14 @AllieOFerreira @A1lison @LucyModahlMD Thank you! We all really need to talk #cardiomegaly by CTR now that we have excellent techniqu
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @ProfDewey: It has been a great pleasure to be able to fund this exciting research by @Arzanauskaite through the Research Seed Grants @E…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @FLipsich: Very interesting paper challenging a concept deeply rooted in most radiologists! #FOAMed #Radiology @Arzanauskaite https://…
RT @Arzanauskaite: 9/ Moreover, intermediate CTR (0.45–0.55) is not sensitive nor specific, and thus it would not be accurate to report tru…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
Very interesting paper challenging a concept deeply rooted in most radiologists! #FOAMed #Radiology @Arzanauskaite https://t.co/1mw02EJo1P
RT @ProfDewey: It has been a great pleasure to be able to fund this exciting research by @Arzanauskaite through the Research Seed Grants @E…
RT @ProfDewey: It has been a great pleasure to be able to fund this exciting research by @Arzanauskaite through the Research Seed Grants @E…
RT @Arzanauskaite: 9/ Moreover, intermediate CTR (0.45–0.55) is not sensitive nor specific, and thus it would not be accurate to report tru…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @ProfDewey: It has been a great pleasure to be able to fund this exciting research by @Arzanauskaite through the Research Seed Grants @E…
RT @Arzanauskaite: 9/ Moreover, intermediate CTR (0.45–0.55) is not sensitive nor specific, and thus it would not be accurate to report tru…
It has been a great pleasure to be able to fund this exciting research by @Arzanauskaite through the Research Seed Grants @EIBIR_biomed and @myESR. More to follow 😉
Check out the results of one of our EIBIR-supported @myesr Research Seed Grant projects led by Monika @Arzanauskaite 👇
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
#InsightsImaging 👇 👇 👇
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: 9/ Moreover, intermediate CTR (0.45–0.55) is not sensitive nor specific, and thus it would not be accurate to report tru…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
RT @Arzanauskaite: We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist the…
We've been taught to report cardiomegaly based on cardiothoracic ratio>0.5 since 1919!😬 Except #whyCMR didn't exist then, & is now the gold standard for🫀size & function Our research supported by @EIBIR_biomed & @myESR shows the CTR is rat
9/ Moreover, intermediate CTR (0.45–0.55) is not sensitive nor specific, and thus it would not be accurate to report true cardiomegaly based on it More graphs available here: the full paper has just been published at #InsightsImaging with #OpenAccess htt