| Title |
Long-term evolution of calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff: clinical and radiological evaluation 10 years after diagnosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s10195-021-00604-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Compagnoni, Alessandra Menon, Simone Radaelli, Francesco Lanzani, Mauro B. Gallazzi, Alberto Tassi, Pietro S. Randelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 19% |
| Mexico | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 95% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#971,099
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#5
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,962
of 442,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.