Physics-based secular variation candidate models for the IGRF
Earth, Planets and Space, October 2021
Alexandre Fournier, Julien Aubert, Vincent Lesur, Erwan Thébault
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||25%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||14%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||3||43%|
|Physics and Astronomy||1||14%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,266,964 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
of 1,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 430,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,266,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.