↓ Skip to main content

Refractory ineffective triggering during pressure support ventilation: effect of proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Refractory ineffective triggering during pressure support ventilation: effect of proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00935-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Fleur Haudebourg, Tommaso Maraffi, Samuel Tuffet, François Perier, Nicolas de Prost, Keyvan Razazi, Armand Mekontso Dessap, Guillaume Carteaux

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,094,093
of 25,109,675 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#689
of 1,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,571
of 434,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#27
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,675 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.