| Title |
Component gap control during posterior‐stabilised total knee arthroplasty using the posterior condylar pre‐cut technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40634-021-00398-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Makoto Kawasaki, Ryutaku Kaneyama, Hitoshi Suzuki, Teruaki Fujitani, Manabu Tsukamoto, Ken Sabanai, Toru Yoshioka, Nobukazu Okimoto, Ryuji Nagamine, Akinori Sakai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| Colombia | 1 | 20% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 2 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,227,671
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#100
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,606
of 430,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.