↓ Skip to main content

More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 188)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps
Published in
Botanical Studies, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40529-021-00323-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Yu, Yaolin Liao, Yufen Cheng, Yongxia Jia, Stephen G. Compton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,348,718
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#40
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,750
of 438,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them