| Title |
Explicability of humanitarian AI: a matter of principles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-021-00096-6 |
| Authors |
Giulio Coppi, Rebeca Moreno Jimenez, Sofia Kyriazi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 22% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,116,678
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#21
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,279
of 425,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.