An Almahata Sitta EL3 fragment: implications for the complex thermal history of enstatite chondrites
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, October 2021
M. Kimura, M. K. Weisberg, A. Takaki, N. Imae, A. Yamaguchi
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||17%|
|Student > Master||1||17%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||4||67%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 434,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.