↓ Skip to main content

Tapentadol vs oxycodone/naloxone in the management of pain after total hip arthroplasty in the fast track setting: an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Tapentadol vs oxycodone/naloxone in the management of pain after total hip arthroplasty in the fast track setting: an observational study
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40634-019-0204-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiziana D’Amato, Federica Martorelli, Giorgia Fenocchio, Vincenzo Simili, Elizaveta Kon, Berardo Di Matteo, Marco Scardino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,133,427
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#116
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,985
of 347,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.