↓ Skip to main content

Screening of recombinant proteins as antigens in indirect ELISA for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Screening of recombinant proteins as antigens in indirect ELISA for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis
Published in
SpringerPlus, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-1-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid IF Souza, Elaine SP Melo, Carlos AN Ramos, Thaís A Farias, Ana Luiza AR Osório, Klaudia SG Jorge, Carlos ES Vidal, Altino S Silva, Márcio R Silva, Aiesca O Pellegrin, Flábio R Araújo

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis is an important infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium bovis, which is responsible for considerable economic losses. This disease constitutes a serious public health problem. Control programs in most countries, including Brazil, are based on the identification and slaughter of infected animals, as defined by the skin tuberculin test, which has its constraints. In the present study, the recombinant proteins CFP-10, ESAT-6, Mb0143, MPB83, PE5, PE13, TB10.4, TB15.3 and a chimera of ESAT-6/MPB70/MPB83 (fusion protein) were tested as ELISA antigens for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. The proteins were produced in Escherichia coli, purified and tested in ELISAs with sera from 126 cattle having tested negative in the comparative intradermal tuberculin test (CITT) and 107 sera from cattle having tested positive in the CITT. Also, 236 sera from two BTB-free beef cattle herds were tested. Among the proteins tested, only the ESAT-6/MPB70/MPB83 chimera demonstrated satisfactory agreement with the CITT (kappa index: 0.688), reflecting in 83.2% sensitivity and 86.5% specificity. The ELISA absorbances of the cattle sera from BTB-free herds showed similar levels to those of CITT positive cattle, probably as the result of successive skin tuberculinizations to define the BTB-free status of the herds. However, the ELISA with the ESAT-6/MPB70/MPB83 chimera was useful to discriminate BTB positive and negative cattle in herds prior to the tuberculin skin test.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,176,348
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,461
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,518
of 280,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#27
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.