| Title |
Benefits and harms of implementing [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing recurrent breast cancer: a prospective clinical study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EJNMMI Research, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13550-021-00833-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marianne Vogsen, Jeanette Dupont Jensen, Oke Gerke, Anne Marie Bak Jylling, Jon Thor Asmussen, Ivar Yannick Christensen, Poul-Erik Braad, Peter Thye-Rønn, Katrine Lydolph Søe, Marianne Ewertz, Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Denmark | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,900,246
of 25,351,219 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#224
of 610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,600
of 428,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,351,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.