| Title |
High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Surat Tongyoo, Porntipa Tantibundit, Kiattichai Daorattanachai, Tanuwong Viarasilpa, Chairat Permpikul, Suthipol Udompanturak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 7 | 21% |
| Mexico | 4 | 12% |
| Argentina | 3 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Congo | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,385,330
of 24,804,602 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#160
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,208
of 422,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,804,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.