↓ Skip to main content

An efficient steganographic technique for hiding data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
An efficient steganographic technique for hiding data
Published in
Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42787-019-0061-6
Authors

Dalia Nashat, Loay Mamdouh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 34%
Engineering 4 13%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 16 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,611,205
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society
#5
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,492
of 473,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them