↓ Skip to main content

Comparing accuracy of bedside ultrasound examination with physical examination for detection of pleural effusion

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 142)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
280 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Comparing accuracy of bedside ultrasound examination with physical examination for detection of pleural effusion
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13089-021-00241-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael H. Walsh, Kang X. Zhang, Emily J. Cox, Justin M. Chen, Nicholas G. Cowley, Christopher J. Oleynick, Leo M. Smyth, Irene W. Y. Ma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 280 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#167,824
of 22,558,632 outputs
Outputs from The Ultrasound Journal
#2
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,466
of 344,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Ultrasound Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,558,632 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them