| Title |
Epidermis segmentation in skin histopathological images based on thickness measurement and k-means algorithm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13640-015-0076-3 |
| Authors |
Hongming Xu, Mrinal Mandal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing
#19
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,291
of 278,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them