| Title |
Clinical outcomes of contemporary lateral augmentation techniques in primary ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40634-021-00368-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucas Beckers, Thiago Vivacqua, Andrew D. Firth, Alan M. J. Getgood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#192
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,152
of 431,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.