| Title |
Biotrauma during ultra-low tidal volume ventilation and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock: a randomized crossover clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00919-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Amado-Rodríguez, Cecilia Del Busto, Inés López-Alonso, Diego Parra, Juan Mayordomo-Colunga, Miguel Arias-Guillén, Rodrigo Albillos-Almaraz, Paula Martín-Vicente, Cecilia López-Martínez, Covadonga Huidobro, Luigi Camporota, Arthur S. Slutsky, Guillermo M. Albaiceta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 38% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,988,656
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#246
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,995
of 436,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.