↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Creating Two Forest Structures and Using Prescribed Fire on Coarse Woody Debris in Northeastern California, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Creating Two Forest Structures and Using Prescribed Fire on Coarse Woody Debris in Northeastern California, USA
Published in
Fire Ecology, August 2009
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0502001
Authors

Fabian C. C. Uzoh, Carl N. Skinner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 9%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Other 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#112
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,812
of 111,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.