↓ Skip to main content

Symptoms and impacts of ambulatory nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a qualitative study and the development of a patient-centred conceptual model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Symptoms and impacts of ambulatory nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a qualitative study and the development of a patient-centred conceptual model
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41687-021-00341-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Williams, Ian Davidson, Mark Rance, Axel Boehnke, Katharina Buesch, Sarah Acaster

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 17%
Other 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 17%
Chemistry 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#314
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,393
of 431,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#20
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.