↓ Skip to main content

The performance costs of interruption during visual search are determined by the type of search task

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
The performance costs of interruption during visual search are determined by the type of search task
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41235-021-00322-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Alonso, Mark Lavelle, Trafton Drew

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 43%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#13,481,071
of 22,361,463 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#230
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,664
of 343,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,361,463 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them