| Title |
Oxygen reserve index for non-invasive early hypoxemia detection during endotracheal intubation in intensive care: the prospective observational NESOI study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00903-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugo Hille, Aurelie Le Thuaut, Emmanuel Canet, Jeremie Lemarie, Laura Crosby, Gregoire Ottavy, Charlotte Garret, Maelle Martin, Amelie Seguin, Pauline Lamouche-Wilquin, Jean Morin, Olivier Zambon, Arnaud-Felix Miaihle, Jean Reignier, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#140,745
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#12
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,899
of 405,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.