↓ Skip to main content

Development of a novel PRO instrument for use in familial chylomicronemia syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Development of a novel PRO instrument for use in familial chylomicronemia syndrome
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41687-021-00347-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Davidson, Christina Slota, Montserrat Vera-Llonch, T. Michelle Brown, Andrew Hsieh, Sheri Fehnel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#401
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,263
of 431,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#32
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.