| Title |
Effect of exercise-induced muscle damage on muscle hardness evaluated by ultrasound real-time tissue elastography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40064-015-1094-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Osamu Yanagisawa, Jun Sakuma, Yasuo Kawakami, Katsuhiko Suzuki, Toru Fukubayashi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,468
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,962
of 264,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#71
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.