| Title |
Influence of sociodemographic and socioeconomic features on treatment outcome in RCTs versus daily psychiatric practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-012-0624-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. van der Lem, P. M. Stamsnieder, N. J. A. van der Wee, T. van Veen, F. G. Zitman |
| Abstract |
Sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics of participants in antidepressant and psychotherapy efficacy trials (AETs and PETs) for major depressive disorder (MDD) may limit the generalizability of the results. We compared trial participants with daily practice patients. We subsequently assessed the influence of socio-demographic and socioeconomic status on treatment outcome in daily practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,582,479
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1,873
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,080
of 282,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.