↓ Skip to main content

On the usefulness of CDA-based score reporting: implications for self-regulated learning

Overview of attention for article published in Language Testing in Asia, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
On the usefulness of CDA-based score reporting: implications for self-regulated learning
Published in
Language Testing in Asia, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40468-021-00127-4
Authors

Yeon-Sook Yi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 18%
Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 5 29%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Mathematics 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Language Testing in Asia
#174
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,858
of 432,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Testing in Asia
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.