↓ Skip to main content

A controversy re-visited: Is the coccinellid Adalia bipunctata adversely affected by Bt toxins?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A controversy re-visited: Is the coccinellid Adalia bipunctata adversely affected by Bt toxins?
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/2190-4715-24-10
Authors

Angelika Hilbeck, Joanna M McMillan, Matthias Meier, Anna Humbel, Juanita Schläpfer-Miller, Miluse Trtikova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Ukraine 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 44 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 54%
Environmental Science 9 18%
Engineering 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,461,725
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#78
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,399
of 250,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them