| Title |
Validity arguments for patient-reported outcomes: justifying the intended interpretation and use of data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-021-00332-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie Hawkins, Gerald R. Elsworth, Sandra Nolte, Richard H. Osborne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 8 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 8 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,835,609
of 23,325,355 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#103
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,791
of 433,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,325,355 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.