| Title |
Late Early Miocene lake deposits near Mauensee, central Switzerland: Fish fauna (otoliths, teeth), accompanying biota and palaeoecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Swiss Journal of Geosciences, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00015-006-1198-5 |
| Authors |
Jürg Jost, Daniel Kälin, Tanja Schulz-Mirbach, Bettina Reichenbacher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#65
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,277
of 171,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.