| Title |
Noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal cannula oxygen for preoxygenation before intubation in patients with obesity: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00892-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maeva Rodriguez, Stéphanie Ragot, Rémi Coudroy, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Philippe Vignon, Jean-Marie Forel, Alexandre Demoule, Jean-Paul Mira, Jean-Damien Ricard, Saad Nseir, Gwenhael Colin, Bertrand Pons, Pierre-Eric Danin, Jérome Devaquet, Gwenael Prat, Hamid Merdji, Franck Petitpas, Emmanuel Vivier, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, Mai-Anh Nay, Pierre Asfar, Jean Dellamonica, Laurent Argaud, Stephan Ehrmann, Muriel Fartoukh, Christophe Girault, René Robert, Arnaud W. Thille, Jean-Pierre Frat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 4 | 10% |
| Mexico | 4 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 24 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,227,994
of 24,988,588 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#142
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,500
of 429,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,988,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.