↓ Skip to main content

An endometriosis classification, designed to be validated

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecological Surgery, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 160)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
An endometriosis classification, designed to be validated
Published in
Gynecological Surgery, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10397-010-0626-8
Authors

Philippe R. Koninckx, Anastasia Ussia, Leila Adamyan, Arnaud Wattiez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2011.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Gynecological Surgery
#42
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,808
of 100,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecological Surgery
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.