↓ Skip to main content

Use of upper stem diameters in a polynomial taper equation for New Zealand radiata pine: an evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Use of upper stem diameters in a polynomial taper equation for New Zealand radiata pine: an evaluation
Published in
New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40490-016-0070-2
Authors

Charles O. Sabatia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 50%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,728,383
of 8,317,445 outputs
Outputs from New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science
#24
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,147
of 251,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,317,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.