Title |
Use of upper stem diameters in a polynomial taper equation for New Zealand radiata pine: an evaluation
|
---|---|
Published in |
New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40490-016-0070-2 |
Authors |
Charles O. Sabatia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 40% |
Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,517,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science
#35
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,283
of 355,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.