↓ Skip to main content

Approximations to inverse tangent function

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inequalities and Applications, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 175)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Approximations to inverse tangent function
Published in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13660-018-1734-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quan-Xi Qiao, Chao-Ping Chen

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,605,790
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#43
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,130
of 341,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.